Showing posts with label diagnostic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label diagnostic. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 8, 2022

Living Group Work Contracts

 

Living Group Work Contracts

Group work is an essential tool for students to reinforce new knowledge and to develop an array of skills—particularly soft skills—that can best prepare them across industries. Soft skills are essential for everyone because they are needed when collaborating with others, they are essential when creating an inclusive & equitable community, and it strengthens other more technical skill sets. As educators, we use our soft skills all the time. These skills include problem-solving, emotional intelligence, communication, adaptability, mindfulness, leadership, self-motivation, time management, etc. These skills are even more valuable when considering the number of future careers turning to automation, which has not been successful in automating most soft skills. Teaching these soft skills is not an easy task. For some courses, teachers build activities that can develop soft-skills into the curriculum with group work, group projects, and open discussions among peers about contemporary hot topics. Yet, there is a simple activity that every course or department can use. Living group contracts can help develop these soft-skills, while creating a classroom environment rooted in equity, inclusion, and responsibility.

What is a Living Group Work Contract?

You might be wondering, “What is a living group contract?” You might know it by a different name, such as, a community agreement, academic/classroom social contract, right and responsibilities document, and a participation agreement. It is an agreement between all parties involved on acceptable behavior, social etiquette, expectations, participatory roles, and on determining consequences when deliverables are not met. The National Equity Project defines it as “as a consensus on what every person in [a] group needs from each other and commits to each other in order to feel safe, supported, open, productive and trusting… so that we can do our best work, achieve our common vision, and serve our [students/families/constituents] well.” A living group work contract can be used for classroom etiquette, group projects, and verbalizing boundaries. The “living” portion means that additional rules or changes to the rules can be discussed as the semester progresses and as needs change. The scope of these contracts depends on the intended use. Below are a few different scenarios that may interest you.

For Creating Classroom Community and Equity in Discussions

A syllabus and student handbook should cover many of the hard and fast rules that your academic program requires. However, there are items beyond what a syllabus or handbook cover that should be discussed among all classroom participants. These missing items can include defining the intrinsic value of a course to a student, creating a sense of belonging in class, and best interpersonal practices during triggering or difficult topics. A living group contract can help students and instructors determine their academic and interpersonal interactions. This also gives a chance for students to advocate their essentials to help create a positive and inclusive learning environment. Their requests can range from emotional support to logistics. Students will appreciate feeling heard as it creates an equitable environment for all of them to engage.

From my own experience of using living group work contracts, I have had students express the following needs:
  • A 5-minute grace period for attendance during inclement weather.
  • Patience and empathy with discussions on triggering or sensitive subject material.
  • Respectfully not speaking over others and patiently waiting to contribute during class.
  • Requesting for lectures to be recorded.
  • Flexible rules on using technology in the classroom.

For Establishing Aspirations and Roles with Group Work

For group work, this is an opportunity to empower both individuals and the collective by creating awareness of expectations and responsibilities. This is a feasible way to reframe the idea of a group being defined by rules into a group that aspires to an idealized deliverable and working arrangement. Each student is responsible to participate, while the entire group is culpable to motivate that participation. Students should find themselves to be more empowered to speak-up and advocate for their needs because they had spent the time developing this group agreement. In this scenario, the aspirations dictate the rules rather than the rules dictating the aspiration.  For example, a group may aspire to avoid a time crunch right before the deadline or for all of them to contribute equally. This would then lead to the question, “How can we achieve that?” Students would then create the agreements to support this aspiration. This change in thinking means that students are buying-in to participate as a group based on their wants instead of being dictated rules that they never had the opportunity to develop.

Establishing Professional Boundaries with Colleagues

Living group contracts are not just for your students! Many of the valuable outcomes from creating a living group work contract or a community agreement can be used towards faculty meetings and committees. Together, you and your colleagues can recognize that collectively you have a vast amount of expertise and want to best support your institution’s mission. This can be particularly important by ensuring that junior faculty, visiting lecturers, and adjunct faculty have the space to voice their unique insights, while respecting the experience of more senior faculty. They are also a great way to make meetings more equitable for faculty of underrepresented groups.

How to Implement a Living Group Work Contract

Before implementing a living group work contract, decide whether you are using one for the classroom environment, a specific project, or a committee. Once you know with whom you intend to develop a living group contract, remember to keep an open mind and be conscientious with your communication. Now, you can begin the process through these suggested steps:

  • Frame the conversation for collective needs and commitments.
  • Categorize the brainstorming into 3 categories:  agreements for aspirations, norms for behavior, and rules for enforceable boundaries. 
  • Engage with everyone either verbally or through individual written lists.
  • Mindfully listen with an open-mind, while respecting diversity.
  • Provide a space of confidentiality that refrains from giving unsolicited advice.
  • Create a living document that can be checked and reevaluated by the group incrementally over the semester or academic year.

In Conclusion

Living group contracts are a necessary step towards practicing equity in our classrooms and departments. They are the means to create a collective vision for students and faculty to strive in creating an inclusive classroom where everyone has the ability to contribute. If you are interested in implementing a living group work contract, let us know and reach-out to schedule a one-on-one consultation here at the Center for Faculty Excellence!

 

Dayton L. Kinney, Ph.D.

Coordinator of Teaching, Learning, & Academic Excellence
Center for Faculty Excellence (CFE)
Texas Woman’s University
Stoddard Hall – Room 305A
940.898.3427
dkinney@twu.edu


Reference List

“Developing Class Participation Agreements.” UMASS Amherst Center for Teaching & Learning. https://www.umass.edu/ctl/sites/default/files/Handout-Developing%20Class%20Participation%20Agreements.pdf .

“Developing Community Agreements.” National Equity Project. https://www.nationalequityproject.org/tools/developing-community-agreements.

Huang, Li-Shih. “Students Riding on Coattails during Group Work? Five Simple Ideas to Try.” Faculty Focus. https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/effective-teaching-strategies/students-riding-coattails-group-work-five-simple-ideas-try/

“Making Group Contracts.” University of Waterloo Centre For Teaching Excellence. https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/teaching-resources/teaching-tips/developing-assignments/group-work/making-group-contracts.

Studio Be. “Community Agreements: Making Meetings Less Stressful.” Studio Be Mindfulness. https://www.studiobemindfulness.com/blog/community-agreements/.

 

 

 

Thursday, September 15, 2022

Assessing Your Students’ Prior Knowledge

Student assessment is an essential component to teaching and understanding how students are processing their learning, so you may evaluate your learning designs. It allows you to track your class’s performance, while also providing evidence of that progress. Finally, it is presented as a task that challenges students to apply or demonstrate their new knowledge.
However, in order to appropriately track your students’ progress there must be an understanding of where your students are beginning from in regards to previous knowledge, experience, and skill readiness. This is considered a diagnostic assessment. This type of assessment measures a student’s baseline about the subject material and is essential for targeting gaps, uncovering misconceptions, understanding the diversity in the classroom, and creating interdisciplinary connections. Below we will be discussing the benefits, and how to implement prior knowledge checks through diagnostic assessments.

Starting Points and Early Intervention

Our students are as diverse as our society, and they come from a range of socioeconomic backgrounds, school systems, and opportunities. The benefit of a diagnostic assessment is that it allows the instructor to have insight into each student’s starting point for the course. You might find that your entire class is new to the subject material, or they may already have some level of familiarity with the course material. A diagnostic assessment can deliver essential information from the first week of class that can include identifying students who might need additional help in skill sets, studying, or covering knowledge gaps. This valuable information gives you a chance to adapt your teaching plans. It can also provide you with a chance to strategize opportunities for students to catch-up. Helpful strategies can include recommending review sessions, tutoring, remedial work, or skill mentoring support. The goal is for your students to have the chance to meet future learning objectives.
Here at TWU, students have additional support for study skills and skill mentoring, including: academic advising (TWU Academic Advising), academic coaching (TWU Get Coaching), writing (Write Site), studying science (Science Learning Resource Center), and mathematics & technology tutoring (Dr. Don Edwards Mathematics & technology Success Center).

Methods to Assess Prior Knowledge

When assessing prior knowledge, it is important to ensure that students are assessed uniformly and are not assigned a grade based on their diagnostic assessment. Your options can include an assessment quiz, a student survey, concept maps, portfolios, and concept inventories.
Some of these examples may be more familiar to you than others. Out of this list, assessment quizzes are likely to be the most familiar to you. Timed assessment quizzes are great at recreating a formative or summative assessment that you will likely implement during a semester, but without the pressure of a grade.  You may even consider using a review or practice quiz for the final. In my own courses, I have had students retake and compare their two results at the end of the semester to reflect on their own progress. You can poll or survey students on their prior experience separately or in conjunction with an assessment quiz. You could have older students who have had experience in your subject material, but could be rusty with problem sets or putting that knowledge into practice.
If you would rather stay away from a diagnostic assessment designed around a comprehensive quiz or student survey, you may consider concept inventories or concept maps. Concept inventories are multiple choice or short answer tests that target only the fundamentals within a subject. Their main purpose is to uncover systemic misconceptions or overlooked nuances by focusing on specific fundamentals.  
For a final example, portfolio reviews are great to track students’ academic growth, especially for papers, creative work, research, or projects. By keeping a student portfolio from the first-year through senior year, instructors are able note gaps and fine-tune individual feedback based on what they can see and where they hope students are by the end of a course. This can be standard for courses in the performing arts, but can also be applied to scientific research, journalism, computer programming, English, education, and more.

Closing Thoughts

Using diagnostic assessments is a first step into ensuring that we support students and making sure that you have the necessary information to teach the course well. Just be sure to communicate that no grade will be assigned regardless of the method that you choose. Finally, if you are not certain of how to proceed after a diagnostic assessment, make sure to reach out to us at the Center for Faculty Excellence, where we can help you with resources and strategies.

Dayton L. Kinney, Ph.D.

Coordinator of Teaching, Learning, & Academic Excellence
Center for Faculty Excellence (CFE)
Texas Woman’s University
Stoddard Hall – Room 305A
940.898.3427
dkinney@twu.edu

 

Reference List

Burdman, P. (2022). To Keep Students in STEM fields, Let’s Weed Out the Weed-Out Math Classes. Scientific American.

Carnegie Mellon University. (2022). Assessing Prior Knowledge. Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence & Educational Innovation.

Cohen, A. (2021). Don’t let a college weed-out class ruin your career plans. Boston Herald.

Cornell University. (2022). Assessing Prior Knowledge. Center for Teaching Innovation.

Morrison, N. (2015). The Surprising Truths About How Students Choose Their Majors. Forbes.

Novak, J. & Cañas, A. The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them. Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.

Singh Chawla, D. (2020). Weed-out Classes in Sciences May be a State of Mind. New York Times.

Thompson, M. E. (2021). Who’s getting pulled in weed-out courses for STEM majors?. Brookings: Brown Center Chalkboard.

Yale University. (2021). Building Upon Students’ Prior Knowledge and Skills. Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning.